… barefoot vs shod?
… foot strike pattern?
This just showed up in my alerts:
The Science of Running: Factors Contributing to Injury Rates in Shod and Unshod Populations
MacKenzie, Ryan; MacKenzie, Lene; Martinez, Alicia; and Cardoza, Marisol
Student-Faculty Research – School of Physical Therapy. Paper 6. 2014
This appears to be a poster presentation of research and I have no more information than what is in the poster here, so it has to be interpreted in that context.
They looked at the kinematics, kinetics and injury rates comparing shod (n=30) vs unshod (n=21) active people in Uganda. Nothing jumps out at me from the limited information given in the methods as being a problem, except it was retrospective, so recall bias may be an issue.
What did they find?:
What did they conclude?
No differences in injury rates between barefoot vs shod or midfoot/forefoot strike vs heel strike.
Add that to the preponderance of other evidence (reviewed here) which is pretty much showing the same thing.
As always, I go where the evidence takes me until convinced otherwise….and this is what the evidence is showing. Nuff said?
Last updated by Craig Payne.
- Foot Strike Pattern and Injury Rates
- Muscle Activity Differences in Forefoot and Rearfoot Strikers
- Running Form Variability and Protection from Overuse Injury
- Overload injuries in barefoot/minimal footwear running
- Impact of injury on ultramarathon performance
- Running Asymmetry, Loading Rate and Injury Risk
- Strength Training for Runners to Prevent Injury
- Examining injury risk and pain perception in runners using minimalist footwear
- Bone injury and the transition to minimalist running
- The Key to Preventing Overuse Injury in Runners is Load Management
- Foot Pronation and Leg Length Differences
- Plantar Pressure Patterns and Injury Prediction